Filed · Answer & General Admission
In re: the complaint published at ihatejeromematthews.com

You’ve read the complaints.
Meet the defendant.

A satirical coalition of prosecutors, peace officers, and federal agents maintains an entire website about how much they dislike this practice. Having reviewed their grievances carefully, the defense enters the following response: admitted.

Stipulated facts

The parties agree on the following.

For the record — the accusations underneath the satire, admitted without objection.

I

He reads the entire record.

Transcripts, minute entries, bodycam timestamps, lab bench notes. The complaint calls this “obsessive.” The defense calls it Tuesday.

II

He files the writ.

When a ruling is wrong and the window is open, the application goes up — assembled, argued, and on time. Opposing counsel are welcome to describe this as “inconvenient.”

III

He answers his own phone.

Day and night, at 504-247-6411. Allegedly this makes him “impossible to outlast.” No contest.

IV

He does not treat clients like case numbers.

Every matter gets the same preparation the complaint objects to. This is the entire business model, and it is not changing.

The defense rests. Briefly.

Retain the lawyer the other side writes websites about.

Calls and texts answered day and night. Urgent matters move to the front of the line.

504-247-6411