The case is the stop, the search, and the lab.
Possession, distribution, conspiracy — the government's drug case is usually built from a stop, a search, a statement, and a lab report. Each one can be tested.
Drug Cases
The Quarter
Drug cases are constitutional law cases wearing street clothes.
Before a jury ever hears the word “possession,” a series of government choices has already happened: the reason for the stop, the scope of the search, the wording of the warrant, the handling of the evidence, the questioning that produced a statement. Each choice is measured against the Fourth and Fifth Amendments — and each one that fails can take evidence out of the case.
In Louisiana, the motion to suppress under La. C.Cr.P. art. 703 is often the whole ballgame. When the evidence goes, the leverage flips: charges get reduced, dismissed, or tried against a hollowed-out file.
And when suppression is denied incorrectly, this practice does what it is built to do: take the ruling up on a supervisory writ before trial — not after conviction.
Every link in the chain, tested.
The stop.
Reasonable suspicion is a real requirement, not a formality. Bodycam, dashcam, dispatch logs, and radio traffic get pulled and compared against the report.
The search.
Warrant or exception — the government must pick a lane and prove it. Consent, plain view, inventory, and search-incident claims each have edges that get pushed.
The evidence.
Chain of custody, weight, testing methodology, and the analyst's work are all subject to challenge — and to confrontation at trial.
The exposure.
Charging choices, habitual-offender exposure, and the state-federal line all shape what a realistic outcome looks like. Strategy follows exposure, not fear.
Asked in nearly every first call.
The police never read me my rights. Does the case get thrown out?
Not automatically. Miranda warnings govern the use of statements from custodial interrogation — their absence can suppress the statement, not necessarily the case. It is one tool among several, and it gets evaluated alongside the stop and the search.
The drugs were not mine. Does that matter?
It can matter a great deal. The State often relies on “constructive possession” — proximity plus inference. Whose car, whose room, whose bag, who had knowledge: these are triable questions, not conceded ones.
Will my case be state or federal?
Quantity, alleged conspiracy scope, firearms, and task-force involvement usually drive that decision. The distinction changes everything from bail to sentencing exposure, and it is one of the first questions counsel answers.
Talk through the case before the next deadline does the talking.
Calls and texts are answered day and night. Share only what you are comfortable sharing — the first conversation is about timing, exposure, and what has to happen next.
504-247-6411